might just be a bit fucked). "Extenuating circumstance to be mentioned on Judgement Day:>We never asked to be born in the first place. As to the contention that PNGs are of a smaller file size, I have found this to be untrue for my purposes. images>, I was unable to achieve a smaller PNG than GIF on even one of my low bandwidth pornographic images. Both were set to lossless which is reasonable when the source image has 6 colors. At least for some people and some purposes, PNGs are inferior to GIFs. 06/20/2003 02:45:11 AM EST (>4. 06/20/2003 03:48:07 PM EST (>1. The GIF patent became public
Center) and the Burroughs Corporation merge to form Unisys. 15th June 1987>: Bob Berry and the team at Compuserve release a new graphics file format called GIF (Graphics Interchange Format). It can handle anything from 2 to 256 colours -- wow! -- and the graphics data is compressed with LZW. Just like Spencer, they had read the LZW algorithm in a magazine and had wrongly assumed that it wasn't patented. The GIF format becomes even more popular. tries to bring up the issue in public. Unisys have been ensuring hardware manufacturers (e. modem manufacturers and Postscript printer manufacturers)
!QAM0֛iipiMK_m&&Bwah0A? a0L&0?4 D 1 i4Av)?S}bb?@0k G%?DDC0@ 00B ! !q &0D\0h* e`?e@HDDDDDDEDDDDDqGUm&i6J IC(QBI(??H%A ? -o"nEH?2 d9\,@e ?Aaa YAqp EEw%vEB;tȸPM&m&־Up* 5[%M/ڨanRW\{Ut?OrDmzӭt @>nfT8dS CdCf C&0?8&a AA "=/zHz\=. n7C,ႛ˙= `?0A2):Iߎ?( ~g8qr~qn ۶Amojp6ON[
might just be a bit fucked). "Extenuating circumstance to be mentioned on Judgement Day:>We never asked to be born in the first place. As to the contention that PNGs are of a smaller file size, I have found this to be untrue for my purposes. images>, I was unable to achieve a smaller PNG than GIF on even one of my low bandwidth pornographic images. Both were set to lossless which is reasonable when the source image has 6 colors. At least for some people and some purposes, PNGs are inferior to GIFs. 06/20/2003 02:45:11 AM EST (>4. 06/20/2003 03:48:07 PM EST (>1. The GIF patent became public
BI?aM4a$A? @08a BA0AD 0A?AVq[Pt. 7? a(v5V _:oVK| c $Iy?& ?a7 ۵???vQyy|}~^?K]oim~izi6 m; 5L+iL-. M1A7Aʱ V!DDDDDDDDqҶPϱ0?FKPD;[-?!L Upl,#;Fr p $v }7 - pۑt?qI,t@1Uu #D֯pG VIy>ߪIj@ lϑ^>3q@ό?(,̍3"|Ŝ ][T40TgS48F?GæF= '0PakFSa[諽$tU?a'_T\SjNaI&ï]}{oVSk.
ǿߧ!}_ ۯL=m:va?i?[kO]:OP}o]Lq Whj%/ooV ^q 8[6z__Gooz _K uǷǙ[~N_'[~ _WQ?/'TO~kkv?iׇZߤ>IO?5Pwx `ǷǷCko?TS*wK>?u>???}ޚ~ۺ_k_o߮]ik?_m&-v/4Nt4¦An$¦ݤniiv a@ `?0 1 !!AnU?A apB a6aa@quC$.
GIFs into an entirely new medium that had little need for backward compatibility. In 1995, Unisys finally published a royalty sheet, exempting "non-commercial" software. By now most folks had forotton the controversy. In 1999, Unisys finally realized the web had become commercialized and got around to agressively enforcing their patent. In my view, the main 'controversy' about this whole thing is that (A) The GIF format wasn't replaced forthright back in 1990, and (B) The avalanche of new online users from 1995-1999 were not made aware of the patent issues surrounding GIF. Thus